Nothing noteworthy has happened recently. We marched in a competition and we played a few songs for judges. Nothing important.
Oh, first tie in a long ass time in the Bengals v. Eagles.
What I want to know is why the Rams keep losing.
What the hell, guys! You have Stephen Jackson (pwnage) Marc Bulger (pwnage) and Tori Holt (pwnage)! Is Orlando Pace still on that team? EVEN MORE REASON!
And it's not just that the defense blows. The offense (note how ALL THOSE PLAYERS ARE ON OFFENSE) has sucked balls for the most part. Honest to God, I cannot understand how they fail to own.
Why the Lions traided Roy Williams evades my mind. They just shucked off a godlike reciever to a team that will now use him as a 3ed string.
This year seems to be a sum of bonehead moves...
The 49ers existing is one of them.
And yah. That's my news. Which isn't really news, but oh well. News news news.
DEAL WITH IT!
2 comments:
i like point out all ur failure when it comes to football
First, Stephen Jackson is good when he's not injured, which is not this year. (Ohh... Maybe that's why their losing)
Second, Yes mark Bulger is good...for the other team. He threw two picks against the niners..let me repeat that for ur sake... the niners. This is the team u say shouldn't exist. And yet they can pick off two of ur pwnage QB's passes.
Hmm... do i sense some flaws in ur facts.
Orldano Pace is godlike...oops now he's injured AGAIN!
Torry Holt is still good yes...but receivers are only as good as the QB so (see Mark Bulger fails)
The Lions traded Roy Williams because they are Al Davis bad with York bad, rolled up(i no u wouldnt agree with that. but how do u explain a team that suxs THAT BAD!!!!!!!!) into one.
Why is the niner's existing a bonehead move
because their better than ur precious Raiders.
Oh and congrats on Winning (Almost, close enough for u guys.)
Hmmm...I love bashing your failed English...
Stephen Jackson IS good, and he hasn't been out for THAT many games...they should have picked up a few more than they have.
Bulger IS good...don't forget that he lead the once-dominant Rams in all their ownage and glory.
The 49ers got lucky that day. They played the Rams fail-defense, which seems to have the strategy of "if we do something SO stupid that nobody understands what we're doing, we might win!" Hardly a challenging victory.
The 9ers got lucky, as I said before, because they had steller days. All their players seemed to peak at the same time. Recievers caught the ball (a forign concept for your team, I know! You must be wondering what a throwing touchdown is by now...) and the O-line dominated the Rams' fail-line plus Leonard Little (or did he retire?).
Pace is godlike. Fear him.
Which leads us to the Rams' biggest problem: O-line.
Their line was once amazing.
It is now amazingly fail. There have been too many injuries and replacements for this line to do anything halfway decent. That is the Rams' largest problem.
Bulger would be fine if he had time to throw and enough protection to set up for a throw.
Jackson would be good if he could get some blocks.
Holt IS good...deal with the facts.
No, the Lions aren't stuck in a worse hell hole than the Raiders. Al Davis is by FAR the worst GM in football. Period.
There WAS logic behind the move. Since the Lions blow THAT much, they wouldn't have enough money to pay for (or room for the egos of) two recievers that could potentially be #1's wherever they went. Dallas was just a bonehead pick.
Niners should be demolished. They're a joke. They only win because the teams around them suck ALMOST as badly as they do (NFL = National Fail League, AFL = Awesome Football League).
And who couldn't win more than 3 games when they play the Seahawks and Rams?
Raiders are only 1 loss behind the niners...let's examine their records.
Week 1: Oak v Den, SF v Ari
Both teams are good, but Denver is better. We'll call this week a push...
Week 2: Oak v KC, SF v Sea
Both wins, both awful teams. KC still had LJ at this point, but again, we'll give 'em a push.
Week 3: Oak v Buf, SF v Det
Raiders had the harder game and lost by 1 point. 9ers beat the worst team in football. CONGRATS! Week 3 goes to Raiders.
Week 4: Oak v SD, SF v NO
Both tallented teams, both under performing. SD has the better players (sorry Bush, LT wins every time). Again, point to Raiders (Oak lost by 10, SF lost by 14)
Week 5: Raiders bye, we'll compare the 9ers game v pats to Raiders v Falcons (9ers bye week)
I'll declare a push, even though the Falcons are a better team. 9ers got killed, Raiders got killed. Pats are a good team, but they aren't that good w/out Tommy boy.
Week 6: Oak v NO, SF v Phi
Point to 9ers. Oakland got killed by NO as well, SF got beat badly by Philly but 9ers did better vs NO and Eagles are a better team.
Week 7: Oak v NYJ, SF v NYG
Jets and Giants. Point to SF, but just barely. Jets are a good team. Giants are a good team. Raiders WON, SF LOST, but 1/2 point to SF for the harder record.
THE TALLY SO FAR:
Oak: 2
SF: 1.5
Week 8: Oak v Bal, SF v Sea
ROFLCOPTER! SF lost to the HAWKS!
BIG TIME! Easy point to Oak for playing the MUCH better team.
Week 10: Oak v Car, SF v Ari
Oak gets the point. Carolina has been dominant this year. I'unno why, but they've been really REALLY good. Both losses, but Arizona had a worse record than Car and couldn't seem to close out games. Carolina's the better team, point Raiders.
4/1.5
Week 11: Oak v Mia, SF v StL
Wow. Oakland again played a better team! LOOK AT THAT.
FINAL SCHEDULE STRENGTH:
Oak: 4 games against harder teams (by week)
SF: 1.5 times against harder teams (by week)
Oakland's record has been WAAAAAY harder. No comparison. Games against the 'Hawks and Rams are must-wins. Oakland has played many stronger teams than the 9ers, and still has a comparible record. GGNR bitch.
Post a Comment